WIJITARS

Unlocking Nigeria's Future Potential Through the Transformative Power of Science and Technology

Volume 1, Number 1, 2025

Authors

1Ukoro, F.O.; 2Atondo, M.V; & 3Ortese, V.

Abstract

Nigeria's quest for sustainable development increasingly centers on the strategic deployment of
science and technology (S&T) as catalysts for economic diversification, healthcare system
strengthening, and food security enhancement. Empirical evidence demonstrates that nations
prioritizing scientific research and technological innovation consistently achieve higher levels of
economic productivity, improved health outcomes, enhanced agricultural yields, and accelerated
industrial growth. This paper critically examines the transformative potential of science and
technology in unlocking Nigeria's economic and developmental potential, emphasizing the
imperative of strategic investments in research infrastructure, innovation ecosystems, and human
capital development. Through comparative analysis of successful S&T-driven development
models from emerging economies, the paper proposes a comprehensive collaborative framework
for integrating science and technology into Nigeria's national development planning architecture.
The findings indicate that by systematically prioritizing S&T investments, Nigeria can significantly
accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals, foster technology-driven
entrepreneurship, and substantially improve citizen well-being.

Keywords

Science, technology, innovation, national development, research & development

References

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative
destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.
Aina, J. K. (2017). Importance of science education to national development and problems
militating against its development. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 740–745.
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. Free Press.
Brooks, H. (1994). The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477
486.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). The teaching of science: 21st century perspectives. NSTA Press.
Cohen, E. (2021). The boundary lens: Theorising academic activity. Routledge.
Conway, G. (2019). The doubly green revolution: Food for all in the twenty-first century. Cornell University
Press.
Crump, T. (2001). A brief history of science. Constable & Robinson.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and
"Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research
Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Fauci, A. S. (2020). The importance of science in the era of pandemics. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 324(13), 1283–1284.
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2019). The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges.
FAO.
Gebbers, R., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Precision agriculture and food security. Science, 327(5967),
828–831.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new
production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
Gowlett, J. A. J., & Wrangham, R. W. (2013). Earliest fire in Africa: Towards the convergence of
archaeological evidence and the cooking hypothesis. Azania: Archaeological Research in
Africa, 48(1), 5–30.
Harvey, B. (2015). The relationship between science and technology. John F. Kennedy School of
Government, Harvard University.
Jasanoff, S. (2016). The ethics of invention: Technology and the human future. W. W. Norton.
Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Harvard Business
School Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness, technology and skills. Edward Elgar.
Lederman, D., & Maloney, W. F. (2003). R&D and development. World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper, No. 3024.
Lee, K. (2019). The art of economic catch-up: Barriers, detours and leapfrogging in innovation systems.
Cambridge University Press.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Penguin.
Mokyr, J. (2016). A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton University Press.
National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NACETEM). (2020). Science,
technology and innovation indicators in Nigeria. NACETEM.
National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Labor force statistics: Unemployment and underemployment report.
NBS.
National Research and Innovation Council. (2021). Draft national policy on science, technology and
innovation. Federal Ministry of Science and Technology.
National Science Foundation. (2023). Science and engineering indicators 2023. NSF.
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson
(Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press.
Okeke, C. (2019). Science education and national development in Nigeria. University Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Science, technology and innovation
outlook 2020. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Main science and technology
indicators. OECD.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science
Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196.
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B., & Sampath, P. G. (2021). Science, technology and innovation in Africa.
Routledge.
Pingali, P. L. (2012). Green revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 109(31), 12302–12308.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. (Original work published 1959)
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Rodrik, D. (2016). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. W. W. Norton.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71
S102.
Schiffer, M. B. (2013). Discovery processes: Trial models. In The archaeology of science (pp. 185–198).
Springer.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
Schwartzberg, E. (2006). "Technik" comes to America: Changing meanings of "technology" before
1930. Technology and Culture, 47(3), 486–512.
Shaar, R., Matmon, A., Horwitz, L. K., Ebert, Y., Chazan, M., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Bourlès,
D., & Keddadouche, K. (2021). Magnetostratigraphy and cosmogenic dating of Wonderwerk
Cave: New constraints on the chronology of the South African Earlier Stone Age. Quaternary
Science Reviews, *259*, 106907.
Siyanbola, W., Adeyeye, A., & Olaopa, O. (2016). Science, technology, and innovation policy and
development in Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation, 8(2), 115–125.
Topol, E. J. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Basic Books.
Tran, T. H. (2018). The scientific and technological revolution and its impact on human life. Journal
of Social Science and Humanities Research, 3(11).
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). Technology and innovation report
2021: Catching technological waves. UNCTAD.
United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Nigeria human development report 2020. UNDP.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Global education monitoring
report 2020. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). UNESCO science report:
The race against time for smarter development. UNESCO Publishing.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Institute for Statistics.
(2024). Global R&D data. UIS.
United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2020). Industrial development report 2020.
UNIDO.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education's promise. World Bank
Group.
World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains.
World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2021). Nigeria agricultural transformation agenda. World Bank.